Catching up with events, The Times today reported on the Regent House 'Discussion' in response to the proposal by the University of Cambridge to lease land for the C2C busway. Despite the fact that their own Environmental Policy requires that the University “protects and enhances the natural environment … by having positive direct and indirect impacts on biodiversity and natural ecosystems”, they have concluded that they should “actively promote the route through the site”.
0 Comments
Last week, a nationally rare Dark Crimson Underwing turned up in Coton Orchard. It was deftly apprehended by Ben Greig of On The Verge and Lois Clarke of the Cambridge Moth Group, in one of their regular moth-trapping sessions. As well as setting the local moth-ers aflutter and being featured in the Cambridge Independent (see below), the news caught the attention of the BBC and also the Guardian, where it attracted so much attention that the piece was elevated to Guardian World. True to form, the GCP are reportedly unmoved, and their comment includes some extremely misleading information, such as the assertion that it's 'mostly young trees on dwarf rootstock' that would be lost. The reality is that busway will destroy the oldest and most ecologically valuable section of the planting, including a Champion Bramley.
Sadly, a single moth, however rare and exciting, is unlikely to swing the case on its own. But it's yet another rarity added to a growing list that evidences the wealth of species and the enormous ecological resources that will be lost – and that no amount of so-called mitigation will be able to replace. The Cambridge Independent gave full coverage to last week's Bioblitz in Coton Orchard. Organised by Ben Grieg of On the Verge Cambridge, the day focused on small mammals, moths, birds, bees, butterflies and bats. And once again, local wildlife experts confirmed the importance of the site's biodiversity, and the presence of some rare species. As biologist and nature writer, Lindsay Rohrbaugh said, "Driving a bus through this habitat really is a dumb idea." In the afternoon, friends and supporters gathered for the launch of Wassail!, a book of poems to celebrate orchards and being sold in aid of the campaign to save Coton Orchard. And it didn't stop there. On this double-page spread, the Cambridge Indy also reported on the threat posed by the off-road busway to family graves, as well as calls from the CPRE (Campaign to Protect Rural England) to scrap the GCP. CPRE Chairman, Dr Alan James, describes it as "out of touch, out of order and out of date." We couldn't have put it better.
On 16th May, Cambridgeshire County Councillors will vote on a motion put forward by Councillor Steve Count, to make a proper comparison of CPPF's wholly on-road proposal and the GCP's proposed route, whose final section goes off-road through fields and Coton Orchard. Ahead of that vote, two letters in today's Cambridge Independent (3rd May) make the case with absolute clarity. The third is Peter Raybeextraordinary, moving account of a wartime childhood
We're absolutely delighted that C2C gets a front page, a double-page spread, and three entries on the letters pages in today's Cambridge Independent, ahead of next week's County Council vote. We hope that all their readers will see that this affects us all.
On 28th September, the Greater Cambridge Partnership's executive board agreed to a formal request to Cambridgeshore County Council to submit their proposal to the Department of Transport for approval. It was good to see the Cambridge Independent giving full-page coverage to the story, and reporting on some of the searching questions put to the board.
It was just rather a shame that the accompanying photo was an old one showing a bleak and barren-looking field, rather than woods or flourishing hedgerows or the 100-year-old orchard. The article ends with Elisa Meschini's justifications for the scheme:
But most importantly, if a different/better/more frequent bus service into Cambridge is required, there is absolutely no need for it to veer away from the A428, cut across green belt and destroy a priority habitat. It can perfectly well follow existing transport networks. Yet the GCP have consistently refused to even consider this option, and have never properly explained why. Full facts and figures here. The outcome of the vote was disappointing but fully expected. The next stage will be a public enquiry in which the application will be considered and objections can be presented. With CPPF, we are now raising funds for to ensure full professional representation at the enquiry.
|